Posted by parhad on July 02, 2001 at 09:46:40:
Some things are so monumentally stupid you can't see them clearly cause they're so big, you have to back way off, just to get the full scope of 'em in sight.
The Gassman says he was tickled pink cause
I was being exposed by the slut in
secret supposed to be out now? I like to get fucked, is that the big "expose"? Okay, so we settled that, now what? There I am, bucket of vaseline in hand, merrily
tripping through life exposing my backsides to every stranger...so? What does that have to do with anything I'm writing about? It's like accusing someone of being
settles any argument. I know quers
could pick Gassman up and throw him to
Does the way Gassman uses his dick have anything to do with what he says or does? Does it matter where he puts it? Or who he puts it into? Does it "expose" him
to find out he uses a condom with a Chaldean Flag at the tip...kind of a Patriotic Tickler? I could care less.
Does it mean something to say that my Father-in Law supports me?(never has). Why is that significant? If he did would it invalidate anything I said. Am I running for
office on a platform that says..."No More Support From In-Laws"! And have I been thus "exposed" as a hypocrite?
I see he is sensitive about the mention of children. Now why bring them up, or their education? Is the guy so stupid he doesn't realize there is a huge home-scholing
movement in this country? Plato was home-schooled. Does he think the world was developed through public schools? Did the Assyrians have them, the Brittish?
Public education is a recent development and an abysmal
failure, though there is no better way to make stupid adults...the kind that
York...who accept whatever nonsense their government feeds them, and especially those who think to hide their nakedness by a little scrap of sheepskin...or two
and half (BIG ass).
Okay...I aint edjicated and Gassman is....I mean you can see it right there in his posts what a sound education he has, and you can read for yourself the subtelty of
mind that gets him that large following in ALL those journals. But I can still think...I still have the right to speak and write. Let my words and thoughts stand on their
own, let them be challenged on the merits...why ban me in that case...let me make an ass of myself. I mean he comes here to read everything...not much to read
there...then he answers me, on HIS forum, when he's welcome to do it here. That forces me to go over there, haul his ass all the way back here and slap him around.
He reads THAT...goes back to his forum, "answers" me..and I have to go get him AGAIN! Kind of silly for such a writer and a thinker and an educated "mind".
Why take off after my friends, my family, and my children? Did they teach him that in college? Did they learn him about all the great philosophers in life who
said..."when having a hard time in dispute and discourse with an individual, change tactics and attack that man's family, in-laws, life-style, dick-size AND children's
education? I should have stayed in college, would have learned that I suppose.
Was it a big deal in his family that he got a degree? I mean we have tons of them in mine...no one is surprised or imprerssed by a doctorate or two. What's the big
deal...like I COULDN'T do it? He's hardly a poster boy for Higher Education...it's thrills and chills and gifts and all.
But why the children? Didn't he say that his wife made him remove the photos of his own lovely children for fear that someone might find some way to drag them
through the mud? I agreed with him at the time. Did she know him better? Why keep "begging" me not to ruin them? Why bring up my oldest and "hope" I didn't ruin
him? Is that a sincere hope? Does
he really care about my children's welfare, or is this more
Why not just stick to the point and face me directly? It's
the same tactic the Sanctions are using against
Bush and Clinton saying to Iraqi parents...."and what about your children's educations and health hmm? Gee I sure hope you don't ruin their lives...what about their
health and diet...boy I'll bet you're going to ruin that too...you college drop-outs"!! He's going for the kids, the same way this admi nistration has been. Same tactic.
My children are just fine thanks. We live in an area where lots of people home-school. We live on a sixty acre vineyard (Cabernet and Franc and Merlot, natch)
Francis Ford Coppola lives 20 minutes away (he caught me taking a leak on his property one day...nice guy). Madonna and Robin Williams have homes a little
further out, they can be seen in town...Coppola has drinks at the local pub.
There is a small pond on the property we swim at...has a dock and all. Trails to hike all over the place. A dog, seven cats and a horse and dirt bike. What's wrong
with this as a school? Why does it matter what I do with my kids? Have I asked Gassman about how he raises his family, his friends, his father-in Law? What
relevance does any of that have? Am I running for public office that I need to be "exposed"? Is this a popularity contest?
AH...there I think I've hit it!