The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> George Orwell and the United Nations

George Orwell and the United Nations
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Wednesday, September 15 2010, 17:27:43 (UTC)
from *** - *** - Windows NT - Internet Explorer
Website:
Website title:

...come to think of it, the new and improved defintion I once found for "hero", defined as "a soldier who fights in an unpopular war"....is very like this new and improved defintion provided by the UN and Tiglath for genocide...it turns a particularly horrible act, an act which gave birth to the very name and concept, into something that you can accuse every nation and government of having done at some time or other...so "whatīs the big deal"?

It just happens to serve the United States' purpose and war efforts to re-define "hero" as somthing no one ever heard of before, but now makes them and their soldiers look good...in the same way the UN and Christians, have redefined genocide, taken it as far away from its original meaning and its very inception, to something so general and all-encompassing that Christians no longer have to feel the odium that rightly attached to them these last 90 years for the horrible crimes they and they alone committed.

The United States, and a Christian nation, as they keep telling us, can now pararde, as heroes, its soldiers who fight an unpopular war declared against innocent civilians who there damned as "terrorists" for defending themselves and accused of allowing "outsiders" to help them, as if the United States would never help Canada or Britain defend itself against a Muslim attack where those countries sttod a good chance of losing and losing badly..."unpopular" because it is illegal and was declared on the basis of known lies....which would make those conducting this war anything BUT heroic...in the older meaning of the word Hero....but it has a new and improved definition, one that serves a political purpose...

Itīs the same with this new definition of genocide...dreamed up a by a political organization beholden to Christian nations, a few of whom helped invent the term "genocide" in the first place by their actions during that war...and it serves their purposes as well, their political purposes, to so define the word that..

a. It lessens the horrors of what they and they alone did...so horrible we needed a new word to describe it.

b. It allows them to better smear Muslims, at a time when they are obviously hellbent on doing so, of being "just the same as we are"...or even worse because "at least we apologized but THEY wonīt". They wont because they were never guilty of genocide.



---------------------


The full topic:
No replies.


***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9