The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Pukey Puritans

Pukey Puritans
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Friday, June 22 2012, 17:22:02 (UTC)
from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Safari
Website:
Website title:

...on a teevee episode about Mardis Gras in New Orleans watched a cop tell a transgender that he/she would have to cover his/her new and lovely boobs....she/he was originally a man, had sex-change sugery and hormones gave her nice tits....so, was she still a man with the right to go topless, or was she now a woman whose tits were offensive, in public?

And today thereīs an article about a woman who beat breast cancer, has no boobs left and wants to swim topless....can she? Will she have to lose her nipples too before she can swim without a top?

Just what is the objection here? Are tits the problem? So that even a man who becomes a woman, can no longer go topless, as he could when a man....and a woman, with no boobs, still canīt go topless because she is a woman, tits or no tits....and if tits are the problem, then what about man-boobs? Some men have bigger breasts than women....how come they can go topless?

Is it just women that are the problem...boobs or no boobs? Is it simply breaking the rules thatīs the problem? And is it a form of punishment to deny a man, who dares become a woman, the right to display his new boobs, which in many cases are the same size as those of the man who has no sex change surgery, remains a man, but has big tits anyway?

Itīs rough being a Puritan.



---------------------


The full topic:
No replies.


***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9