The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: I might be mistaken...

Re: I might be mistaken...
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Thursday, April 26 2012, 20:34:18 (UTC)
from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

Rashad wrote:
>I myself will never again use wiki to read about anything. If they care what is passed on as a fact, then who knows what other bullshit exists on there. But since it's in the open and so many people use it, it's a good place to engage the nationalists and show just what kind of propaganda they are involved in.

...xactly! They thought they were safe...but, so long as I use Dr Joseph and all his sources in my writings, they can't remove them. Not liking what Joseph writes is no reason to remove it.

So, really, we're getting what we always wanted from them...they either have to stand their ground and go one on one in every instance, or let it be seen that they have nothing to say, no answers, except their usual bullshit...they can't remove me because I "write too much"....everyone else can write as much, if they have anything to say, if not more...and they haven't a single historian on their side. In reality this is even better than being on their sites because we have more of a white-man audience.

Next we have also to issue the Beth-Shlimoon challenge...anywhere they claim to have been massacred or forcibly converted, and any slanders against Islam for killing any of them JUST because of their religion...I can bring up what Dr Joseph has to say about how many times our Christians took sides with the Russians and British and now Americans to murder their Muslim neighbors just for THEIR religion, when Islam always treated them better than Christianity did, I mean major sects of Christianity.

In fact we already have posted many of those historical sources and quotes to show just the opposite of what they allege...so they're screwed there as well.

What happens to the rest of their claims when their editor can't produce a single instance where their claims of Muslim forced conversions and the rest of it are upheld by valid historians? Like Shlimon was never able to do? What will that tell others about their claims to being Assyrian, which are also not backed up by a single historian, of THIS topic?

We'll expose the one lie and therefor force better scrutiny of their other, big, lie.



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9