The Inside Assyria Discussion Forum #5

=> Re: Turkish "genoide" sillies

Re: Turkish "genoide" sillies
Posted by pancho (Moderator) - Monday, November 25 2013, 20:08:14 (UTC)
from *** - *** Mexico - Windows NT - Mozilla
Website:
Website title:

...great lecture...especially the similarities between the Armenian nationalsists and our assyrian ones...I mean both groups are passionately stupid and ignorant and LOVING it that way. And the question period after is precious...you'll see assyrians posing as Armenians.

..McCarthy didn't touch on 1915...he stuck to the events that supposedly happened in Sasson in the 1890s...but you could tell this was the blueprint of lies and fabrications for what was to come...basically it is the same as the assyrian or rather Nestorian experience...Western Missionaries, believing Islam was a great evil and only Christianity was good, dedicated themselves to lying and fabricating in a "good cause" and, this is important, they WANTED a war, a war between Jesus and Muhammad and for this end they used the Armenians and Nestorians too...and the Armenians also felt that only through a war might they get an Armenia...

...their problem, at that time, was the same as assyrians have now when they demand an assyria...only 25% of the population there was Armenian...so what gave them the right or means to make their own Armenia? It certainly couldn't be through democratic means because they were in the minority and would lose any such vote, plus which they were a Christian minority, so no chance by any other means than war..and Armenian rebellion and killing of Muslims was their ticket...to war and through war MAYBE an Armenia...not only rebelling but provoking Turks to retaliate and of course fabricating massacre stories in hopes, same as with us, of the Western Christians SAVING them.

Same with our assyrians in the north of Iraq where they have not the numbers for any kind of democratically mandated assyria...so how could they hope to get one? By war, of course, but a war they would sit out, in Turlock and Chicago and Los Angeles and Sydney and Sweden and France. This was their great hope, their "golden opportunity",,,that through a war against Iraq they MIGHT stand a chance...only they forgot history and have paid the price....correction, have made OTHERS pay the price.

All of a sudden, considering sources and all of that, I'm not at all sure that a massacre of any kind took place in Semele. The very fact that we report it AS a massacre and a genocide too (why not when you're at it)...for as little as our assyrians understand the meaning of words and as eager as they have shown themselves to lie in order to get ahead.. the troubling truth is that there is no rational reason ever given for why the Iraqis stopped at only a few victims in Semele...if they were as hell-bent on wiping out Christians, as say the Germans would be, why didn;t they kill EVERYONE in Semele...and then why didn;t they move a few miles down the road and kill all the Christians in the next village, and the next, and the next? Given what we claim about the bloodlust of Muslims, why did they stop...why such moderation?.

When given the choice, it is wiser to believe that Christians lie than Muslims massacre...plenty of evidence for both.



---------------------


The full topic:



***



Powered by RedKernel V.S. Forum 1.2.b9